The “Doom Spending” Phenomenon: When Young People Choose Shopping to Fight Anxiety
Amid economic uncertainty, one phenomenon has been widely discussed on social media and has attracted the attention of many financial…
Who would have thought a simple joke could explode into a full-blown social-media drama?
Everything began with a viral post comparing the face of RM BTS to senior TV host Indy Barends. For some, the comparison was harmless humor — but for hardcore BTS fans, the ARMY, it was an insult to their idol.
And just like that, a tiny spark on social media turned into a wildfire that dragged a local skincare brand, Somethinc, into the chaos.

Somethinc’s admin casually replied “UDAAAH BANG…” under a tweet by influencer Gilang Bhaskara, who had posted the Indy Barends meme that was trending at the time.
But the digital world is merciless — context rarely survives, and nuance often gets erased.
ARMY interpreted Somethinc’s reply as the brand supporting the joke that mocked RM. Within hours, Somethinc’s accounts were flooded with angry comments. The anger didn’t stop on X (Twitter): it poured into Shopee live shopping rooms, TikTok Live, and even targeted hosts and staff who had nothing to do with the comment.
Many netizens felt this had crossed the line — no longer “defending an idol,” but bullying regular workers who were simply doing their jobs.
This phenomenon illustrates something deeper: how thin the line is between admiration and fanaticism. Affection for an idol can grow so intensely that fans feel entitled to control how others speak, joke, or react about them. One wrong word — even accidental — and boom — the internet becomes an arena of digital gladiators.
The situation escalated when influencer Prasetja (@IamPrasPrasetja), known for his bluntness and 12.4K followers, posted a strong defense of Somethinc and its employees.
He wrote:
“I stand with @Somethinc4u for doing business like this. Kalau kalian followersku ada ARMY Indonesia yang anti dan masih mendukung gerakan harassment, bullying, dan tindakan misoginis kpd host Somethinc, tolong unfollow aku. I don’t care about y’all community and BTS.”

Prasetja, who works at PT Trisula Ungu Indonesia — a social-psychology and research organization — soon became the next target. His thread, intended to defend victims of harassment, instead fueled ARMY’s anger. They attacked him personally, accusing him of belittling the fandom.

He argued that the inability to distinguish criticism from insult — and retaliating with personal attacks — reflected weak psychological mindedness, the capacity to understand one’s own thoughts and behaviors.
He added that ARMY projected negative emotions onto others and noted that Somethinc’s admin never insulted RM, yet became the subject of massive hate.
The drama escalated further.
ARMY no longer focused solely on Somethinc — they shifted their anger to Prasetja and his workplace. Many demanded PT Trisula Ungu Indonesia take action, even calling for boycotts, mass reports, and corporate sanctions.
For some ARMY members, this was “holding a public figure accountable.”
But for many others, the response resembled toxic overreaction, a coordinated harassment wave disguised as moral righteousness.
This shows how fandoms, when mobilized collectively, can shift from solidarity to social pressure — even intimidation.

The company released an official statement after receiving numerous complaints. They clarified that:
In short, the company publicly defended its employee — a move that earned widespread support from neutral netizens.
Amid the uproar, Somethinc quietly launched its new lip collection, “Kiss My Ace.”
The lineup included lip balms and lip tints in bold purple shades, paired with the playful tagline “Ace your lip game.”
A bold name, bold colors, bold attitude — aligning perfectly with their young, digital-native audience.
But the timing raised eyebrows: launching during a reputation crisis made some interpret it as strategic damage control, while others saw it as coincidence.
Still, the release symbolized Somethinc’s attempt to shift public focus from drama to product innovation.
This entire case is a reminder:
Admiring idols is natural — they inspire, motivate, and bring joy.
But when admiration morphs into a force that attacks, bullies, or harms others, something has gone wrong.
Toxic fandom transforms affection into ego — a competition over who “loves the idol the most.”
Ironically, in trying to protect their idol, fans often end up damaging the idol’s image in the eyes of the public.

Using Socindex, big-data analysis of keywords “ARMY,” “Somethinc,” “BTS” during 5–12 November 2025 revealed:
This wasn’t just fandom noise — it became a national-scale viral event spreading far beyond BTS fans.

The engagement spike showed how a minor issue can snowball into a massive online spectacle within hours. The peak came when ARMY consolidated narratives, created threads, shared “evidence,” and called for boycotts of Somethinc and Prasetja’s employer.

Sentiment analysis revealed:

Emotional mapping showed mainly anger and heightened anticipation as users waited for corporate responses.

Despite the chaos on social media, online news coverage remained relatively low.
Newstensity recorded 86 articles (5–12 November), with negative and positive news appearing almost evenly.

Traditional media tend to filter social-media drama as “perception-based conflict,” covering it only when it becomes socially or institutionally relevant.
This explains why X looked like it was “on fire,” while the media landscape stayed comparatively calm.
The ARMY–Somethinc episode reveals the complex duality of fandom culture:
Fandom becomes toxic when the impulse to protect an idol transforms into a crusade to attack others.
The real question is not how much we love our idols — but how we ensure our admiration doesn’t harm people who did nothing wrong.
Because in the end, the loudest voices in defense of an idol can also be the ones that damage that idol’s image the most.
Amid economic uncertainty, one phenomenon has been widely discussed on social media and has attracted the attention of many financial…
Case Anatomy: Chronology and Involved Parties The corruption case involving the procurement of Chromebook laptops, which ensnared former Minister of…
In many marketing meetings, one question still comes up: is advertising no longer effective? That question is flawed from the…
In the digital platform era, livelihoods are no longer determined entirely by human effort. In many cases, job opportunities are…
Growing public attention toward environmental issues has placed the Jakarta Provincial Government’s action to clear suckermouth catfish from several rivers…
After discussing the geopolitical playbook in the previous article, the question now becomes more concrete: how have companies responded and…
Gen Alpha Is No Longer a Future Market For a long time, Gen Alpha has been positioned as a future…
The acid attack that targeted Andrie Yunus, an activist from the Commission for the Disappeared and Victims of Violence, triggered…
Almost exactly one month after the Iran–Israel war erupted, the world has begun to feel one of its consequences: the…
During the period from February 23 to March 12, 2026, Indonesia’s media landscape and public sphere were animated by one…